THE MORGENTHAU PLAN🌽âŒAS ILLUSTRATED BY THE PURPOSEFUL DESTRUCTION OF CARLY BURD'S COMMUNITY GARDEN
Sama_El
Published on Apr 25, 2023
Carly Burd took to TikTok after her allotment in Harlow was destroyed by salt.
She had been growing vegetables to feed her local community during the cost of living crisis
Read more here 👉 https://trib.al/aBPGnxK
https://news.sky.com/story/woman-who-grew-food-for-families-struggling-with-cost-of-living-crisis-has-garden-ruined-in-attack-12855760
Source: https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1646264428856242183?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1646264428856242183%7Ctwgr%5E28f20a4c7f152f302530f6bcf93c8ea09eba1c99%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voterig.com%2Firan7.html - thanks always to JSF
QUESTION: Who would pay for enough salt to destroy a large plot of land that was being used to feed people?
There's only one answer: A Jew. And this clearly shows what the agenda is going to be, "they" are going to kill us.
This woman is oblivious to how evil Jews are and can't understand why anyone would do this. She just thinks it is vandals. Actually, it is war. No hood rat is going to blow money on enough salt to kill all that ground, and then do THAT MUCH work throwing it evenly to do the job. This is actual funded warfare, NO IFS OR BUTS.
THE SLAUGHTER OF GERMANS 4-24-23
https://www.bitchute.com/video/C7E7NmCup4kI/
If I can find a good thumbnail, I'll post this here...but for now, enjoy ELON AND CUCKER TARLSON DEEPFAKE 😋ðŸ„😵â€ðŸ’«ðŸ«¨ðŸ¤¯ A ROCK PARTY WEEKEND:
https://altcast.tv/v/YwxS1S
Onkelos then went and raised Jesus the Nazarene from the grave through necromancy. Onkelos said to him: Who is most important in that world where you are now? Jesus said to him: The Jewish people. Onkelos asked him: Should I then attach myself to them in this world? Jesus said to him: Their welfare you shall seek, their misfortune you shall not seek, for anyone who touches them is regarded as if he were touching the apple of his eye (see Zechariah 2:12).
Onkelos said to him: What is the punishment of that man, a euphemism for Jesus himself, in the next world? Jesus said to him: He is punished with boiling excrement. As the Master said: Anyone who mocks the words of the Sages will be sentenced to boiling excrement. And this was his sin, as he mocked the words of the Sages. The Gemara comments: Come and see the difference between the sinners of Israel and the prophets of the nations of the world. As Balaam, who was a prophet, wished Israel harm, whereas Jesus the Nazarene, who was a Jewish sinner, sought their well-being.
https://www.sefaria.org/Gittin.57a.4?lang=bi
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskBibleScholars/comments/8xpkym/comment/e24th6r/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Biblical Hebrew | Semitic Linguistics
Background: This is from the story told in the Talmud of "Onkelos bar Kalonikos, the son of Titus's sister", where he wants to convert to Judaism and so he goes and successively raises Titus, Balaam, and probably Jesus from their graves, asks them who's important in the next world (to which each of them answers [the nation of] Israel), whether he should attach himself to them [Israel] (to which they each give different answers), and what that persons punishment is (to which they each give different answers).
Who is it talking about?: Our current versions say "×זל ×סקיה [ליש"ו] ×‘× ×’×™×“× (לפושעי ישר×ל)â€" which literally translates to "He went and raised [Yesh"u] with necromancy (the sinners of Israel)". Pay attention the square brackets and round parentheses. In these versions, which are all basically reprints of the Vilna Shas, the round parentheses indicate something that was in the main manuscripts the editors were basing the printed edition on, but the editors felt was a mistake based on other manuscripts, while the square brackets indicate something that was not in the main manuscripts, but the editors felt should be inserted based on other manuscripts. This means that the main manuscripts (which had likely been censored at some point either by or out of fear of Christians) said sinners of Israel, while some other manuscripts said Yesh"u, which the editors felt was more correct. I haven't studied the manuscripts myself, but I have no reason to disagree with the editors.
Is Yesh"u a name?: The "quotation mark" (called gershayim in Hebrew) in the text of the Talmud itself usually indicates either an acronym or a number in Hebrew numerals. In other texts, it is also often used to indicate a foreign word, the name of a letter of the alphabet, or some other word that's somehow seen as not being a "real" word. Note that it is not normally used for names (unless the name is an acronyms). I presume that either the name Yesh"u was turned into a "backronym", or somehow for some other reason the gershayim got anomalously added to the name over time. But it is also possible that it really is an acronym for something and not really referring to the name Jesus.
Read the rest at the above URL
Add to
Flag Video
Rate video
Rate video
Up next
Recommended
-
Watch Later
12:07Confronting Anti-Semitism by Engaging Historical Thinking Skills - Carly Fox
306 views 954 days ago -
Watch Later
![The Illustrated Protocols of Zion - Brother Nathanael (Nov. 6, 2011)]()
00:01The Illustrated Protocols of Zion - Brother Nathanael (Nov. 6, 2011)
1K views 1394 days ago
